Showing posts with label the babysitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the babysitter. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

The Deceptive Significance of Cover Art



People who say they don't judge a book by a cover are full of shit. 







Sorry. 

I just wanted to set the mood and let you know that this blog post won't be lathered in B.S. I won't be shoveling fake opinions in an attempt to woo you into liking me enough to buy my books.


Nope.

Today, after two large coffees and not much sleep, I will be raw, honest, and probably piss you off. Not that I'm not usually honest, it's just in this moment, I refuse to sugar coat this message.





Book covers matter. Sometimes more than the implementation of the whole plot-line.

Isn't that fucked up?

For a writer, it's disappointing and horrific that before someone gives your words and characters a chance. . .they judge your cover, something that is so outside of your creative process. . .it's ridiculous. 












However, as a reader, I won't buy a book if it isn't pleasing to the eyes, well-executed, or grab my attention in some way. So although I'm annoyed about book covers representing the story as an author. . .oh I'm a complete contradictory person when it comes to me buying a book.

But let's dig deeper. . .


Which book would you buy?

A)




B)



An unexpected experiment happened for me back in the fall of 2013 (so long ago). Amazon decided to finally regulate ebooks that they considered breaking their mature content rules. Basically, the site started deleting books that appeared to involve incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and all those things that pretty much disgust the normal population of people. 



My novel The Babysitter was deleted because (I assume) it showed a "shadowy vagina" and because the woman looked like an underage girl with a teddy bear. 
Yikes. 


What is interesting is the next day I quickly grabbed a quick stock image that I believed represented the characters and the plot-line, then had an artist due the font. I more wanted my short story out there for my fans who were waiting on other books.


This became the cover. . .three hours later. . .The Babysitter was on the Erotica Bestseller's list as if triggered by magic.



With the other cover, the novel sold five books a day. With the new cover, it sold a thousand books in two weeks. The book continued to rise up to the top twenty on the Erotica list and remained there for several weeks.

Is this confirmed proof that book covers matter?

No.
There are so many reasons why people decided to give my short story a try on that day and all of those reasons could have nothing to do with the cover. 

However, do I place more significance on books covers these days?

Um. . .did you see the part about the book going from 5 sales to a thousand?



Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Vajayjay and Amazon: What I'm learning as I self-publish.

Note: As of this date, Amazon just took The Babysitter off of their site again for the cover. I'll have to get a new cover for it.


FYI, to all writers interested in self-publishing. Amazon does not play with vajayjay on their covers.


Amazon rejected The Babysitter book cover five times. 

The one below is the approved one.



Initially the cover looked like this:


Obviously the big difference of the two is that one has a big ugly ass box at the bottom and one doesn't.

What is funny to me, is that Amazon never explained why they rejected the original cover. 

 photo 71cb5865-9742-4a8a-b019-71d70d467f9d_zps2cb93434.jpg

I (my slow behind) had to guess. 
Clearly, for most people, the answer was obvious, but for me. . .

I stared at that cover for hours, wondering, "What's wrong with it?"

Finally my husband walked by and said, "It looks like the girl's vajayjay is showing a little in the shadows."



 photo b975b9b8-a8d1-45c2-9466-753d718f81be_zpsd1d40cde.jpg



To be fair to me and the model:
I don't think this model is completely naked. 
Surely she's wearing underwear right? 
But no. . .Amazon wasn't having it.

This forced me to change The Muse's book cover from bare nipple. . . 

Hey, I thought I could get away with it. . .it's ART!



Here's the painted over nipple cover that they did accept:




I get Amazon's reasoning.

However, I found the original covers to be captivating and not lewd at all. Especially when there are some pretty icky lewd covers out there. 


Sorry. I bet you won't be able to get that out of your mind for the rest of the day. . . 


Granted, this is just my personal opinion but. . .